| Home | Beer Forum | Brew Forum | Tutorials | Calcs | Recipes | Humour | Gallery | Beer Glossary | Directories & Links | Contact Us |

For discussion on commercial beers and breweries please use the pint.com.au Beer Forum. Please Note: You need to register separately for each forum

Benefit of using malt over brewbooster

Discussion on malt.

Postby Jovial Monk » Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:09 pm

Heh, never annoyed!
Jovial Monk
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:57 am

Postby mr magoo » Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:59 pm

is it better to use liquid malt or powded malt? i know it's a bit more stuffing around with powded but i thought that the powded might be less procest, more natural and better tasting.
mmmmm beer! - Homer Simpson
User avatar
mr magoo
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:52 am
Location: perth

Postby RGOR » Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:10 pm

postmodern wrote:The only benefits are better head retension, maltier flavour, cleaner fermentation, less "cidery" tastes, reduced flatulence from maltodextrine (foul stuff found in many "brew boosters"), etc. In short, I recommend you do it.

Along with better yeast, fermentation temperature control, good sanitation and water filtering, replacing the mystery bags with good quality malt extract is one of the best things you can do to improve kit beers.


I hear what you say on all the other stuff, but how is less flatulence a benefit?
"The only thing to fear is running out of beer"

"I graunte, ywis, quod he, but I moot thynke
Upon som honest thyng while that I drynke."
User avatar
RGOR
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:55 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Postby Wakkatoo » Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:34 pm

Well. for one, a reduced rate of farting (not to mention severity) is much more popular with she-who-must-be-obeyed (nod nod, wink wink)

Last weekend I drank quite a bit of commercial stuff (I was forced to your honour!) and found that not only did my average fart rate increase, so did the severity. Needless to say, I was not popular! 8)
No dear, that fridge is for the beer.

"Homebrew my arse, get that shit to forensics!" - Crackerjack

On Tap - Ginger beer, SMASH Pils
Fermenter - Maibock
Planning - American Brown, Vienna Lager, Dunkelweizen
User avatar
Wakkatoo
 
Posts: 602
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 1:53 pm
Location: Creswick

Beer-induced farting

Postby Jovial Monk » Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:50 pm

Heh! Another good fart inducer is lactose, put into milk stouts and sometimes in ginger beer.

The yeast can't break it down, so the lactose adds body to the beer or ginger beer. However, our intestinal flora has no problem breaking down the lactose, into the usual alcohol and CO2.

On a caravan trip I suggest a nice curry and milkstout all round :)
Jovial Monk
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:57 am

Postby mr magoo » Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:11 pm

ummmmm back to my question.
is it better to use liquid malt or powded malt? i know it's a bit more stuffing around with powded but i thought that the powded might be less procest, more natural and better tasting
mmmmm beer! - Homer Simpson
User avatar
mr magoo
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:52 am
Location: perth

Postby RGOR » Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:05 am

Wakkatoo wrote:Well. for one, a reduced rate of farting (not to mention severity) is much more popular with she-who-must-be-obeyed (nod nod, wink wink)

Last weekend I drank quite a bit of commercial stuff (I was forced to your honour!) and found that not only did my average fart rate increase, so did the severity. Needless to say, I was not popular! 8)


I say wear it as a badge of pride!
"The only thing to fear is running out of beer"

"I graunte, ywis, quod he, but I moot thynke
Upon som honest thyng while that I drynke."
User avatar
RGOR
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:55 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Postby Rysa » Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:01 am

mr magoo wrote:ummmmm back to my question.
is it better to use liquid malt or powded malt? i know it's a bit more stuffing around with powded but i thought that the powded might be less procest, more natural and better tasting


Instead of completely plagiarizing thought i'd cut and paste.

Quote RWH - Each brand of malt will be different. Normally this is due to the difference in the mashing temperature at which the malt extract was converted from starch to sugars. This will result in difference balances of fermentable to unfermentable sugars. Another influence is the country of origin and year of the original barley used to make it.

As for whether there's a fundamental difference between liquid and dry malts, not really. The only thing that might be worth taking into account is the additional processing that goes into the dried variety. - End quote.

It seems dry has a longer shelf life too and is more concentrated hence the reason you use less volume compared to liquid. Comes down to personel preference in the end i reckon, going through a liquid phase myself now.
Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut.
Ernest Hemingway
Ballarat Website Design
User avatar
Rysa
 
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:15 pm
Location: Ballarat, Victoria.

Previous

Return to Malt

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

| Home | Beer Forum | Brew Forum | Tutorials | Calcs | Recipes | Humour | Gallery | Beer Glossary | Directories & Links | Contact Us |